The Shape of Future AI Models: Seven Architecture Trends from 2024 to 2026
Review copy. The full designed version, with diagrams, charts and FAQ schema, is in future-architecture.html and should be pasted in through the admin console before publishing.
The plain dense Transformer that powered ChatGPT in 2022 is being taken apart, one layer type at a time. By late 2026 the strongest open models activate about 3% of their parameters per token, replace three quarters of their attention layers with linear-time alternatives, compress their memory of the conversation by 90% or more, and in some cases stop generating text left to right at all. Each change responds to the same pressure: cost, and in particular the memory wall.
This report reviews seven architecture trends with evidence up to October 2026, rates their maturity, combines them into a plausible 2028 model and ends with five predictions that can be proved wrong.
- 3.1% of DeepSeek V4 Pro's 1.6 trillion parameters are active per token
- 3:1 linear-attention to full-attention ratio in Qwen3-Next, Qwen3.5 and Kimi Linear
- ~1,000 tokens per second claimed by diffusion language models on standard GPUs
Why the dense Transformer is under pressure
A classic Transformer uses every parameter for every token, and every attention layer compares each new token with every earlier one, so the key-value (KV) cache grows without limit. At 4,000 tokens this was fine. At 1 million tokens, with agents running for hours, it is not. Almost every trend below reads fewer bytes per token, keeps less state per user, or produces more tokens per pass.
| Trend | What it fixes | Example | Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Sparse mixture-of-experts | Weight bytes per token | DeepSeek V4, Qwen3-Coder | Standard |
| 2. Compressed and sparse attention | KV cache size | MLA, DeepSeek V4 | Standard |
| 3. Hybrid linear attention | Quadratic attention | Qwen3.5, Kimi Linear, Nemotron 3 | Entering flagships |
| 4. Conditional memory lookup | Compute wasted on recall | DeepSeek Engram | Emerging |
| 5. Test-time memory and learning | No learning after training | Titans, Hope | Research |
| 6. Diffusion and parallel decoding | One token per memory pass | Mercury 3, Gemini Diffusion | Early commercial |
| 7. Recursive and latent reasoning | Paying for reasoning in tokens | Tiny Recursive Model | Research |
1. Sparse mixture-of-experts becomes the default
MoE replaces each feed-forward block with many experts and a router that picks a few per token. The active share has fallen steeply:
| Model | Active of total | Active share |
|---|---|---|
| Mixtral 8x7B (2024) | 13B of 47B | 27.7% |
| Qwen3-Coder-480B (2025) | 35B of 480B | 7.3% |
| DeepSeek V3 (2024) | 37B of 671B | 5.5% |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (2026) | 13B of 284B | 4.6% |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (2026) | 49B of 1.6T | 3.1% |
Our benchmark of cheap LLMs for agents found DeepSeek V4 Flash tying Claude Opus 4.8 on 20-step agent chains at about one eleventh of the cost per run, largely because only 13 billion parameters work on each token.
2. Attention gets compressed and sparse
- Grouped-query attention: Llama 3 70B keeps 8 KV heads instead of 64, an 8× smaller cache.
- Multi-head Latent Attention: DeepSeek-V2 cut the KV cache 93.3% and lifted maximum throughput 5.76×.
- Compressed sparse attention: DeepSeek V4 (April 2026) combines Compressed Sparse Attention and Heavily Compressed Attention, needing 27% of V3.2's per-token compute and 10% of its KV cache at 1M tokens.
Third-party analyses describe V4's memory working at three timescales: recent tokens in plain attention, mid-range context as compressed blocks selected by a sparse index, and the distant past as heavily compressed summaries.
3. Hybrid linear attention enters the flagships
Linear attention and state-space models keep a fixed-size state instead of a growing cache. The 2025 to 2026 answer was to mix them with a little full attention. Qwen3-Next mixed three Gated DeltaNet blocks with one gated attention block and reached a native 262,000-token context, against 32,000 for its predecessor, and Qwen moved the hybrid into its flagship Qwen3.5. Kimi Linear refined the linear layer and used MLA for the full-attention layers. NVIDIA's Nemotron 3 interleaves Mamba-2 blocks with sparse MoE and keeps attention in only a few layers. The lesson: keep a little full attention for precise recall, and let cheap recurrent layers carry most of the sequence.
4. Conditional memory: stop recomputing what you could look up
In January 2026 DeepSeek published Conditional Memory via Scalable Lookup, introducing Engram, hashed N-gram embedding tables inside the network for constant-time retrieval of static patterns. Splitting a parameter budget between MoE experts and Engram tables produced a U-shaped scaling law, so the best results came from a mix. Scaled to 27 billion parameters, it beat an iso-parameter, iso-compute MoE baseline. Because lookups depend only on input tokens, they can be prefetched: DeepSeek offloaded a 100 billion parameter table to CPU memory with under 3% overhead. Early coverage linked Engram to V4, though V4's report emphasises its attention design and Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections.
5. Models that keep learning while they run
Titans (Behrouz and Zhong, NeurIPS 2025) pairs attention as short-term memory with a neural long-term memory whose weights update at test time based on surprise, and reports scaling past 2 million tokens. An independent reimplementation noted the specific benefit of the test-time updates was not isolated. Follow-up work on Nested Learning and Hope extends the idea, but none of it is in a major commercial model yet.
6. Diffusion: generating text in parallel
| Model | Reported tokens per second | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Gemini Diffusion | 1,479 | Google DeepMind demo average |
| Mercury Coder Mini | 1,109 | Artificial Analysis, H100 |
| Mercury 3 | 1,068 | Inception claim, 19 October 2026, untested |
| DiffusionGemma | ~1,000 | Google, H100, open model |
| Mercury 2 | ~720 | Artificial Analysis measured (claimed 1,009) |
| Typical frontier autoregressive model | ~100 | Industry estimate |
Inception shipped Mercury 2 in February and Mercury 3 on 19 October with a 1M context and launch pricing of $0.10 per million input tokens. Ant Group scaled LLaDA 2.0 to 100 billion parameters. The DFlash framework uses a small diffusion model as a speculative drafter for over 6× speedups on some tasks. Quality still lags: Google notes DiffusionGemma trails Gemma 4.
7. Recursion and latent reasoning
Samsung SAIL's Tiny Recursive Model, with 7 million parameters, scored 45% on ARC-AGI-1 and 8% on ARC-AGI-2, above several large reasoning models, though it trains per task with 1,000× augmentation. Abstract Chain-of-Thought, covered in our 2026 research review, produced reasoning up to 12× shorter at matched accuracy.
The quieter changes underneath
DeepSeek V4 replaced residual connections with Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections, adopted the Muon optimizer and ran attention, normalisation and routing in FP8. NVIDIA's 2026 Rubin systems pair GPUs with SRAM-based Groq LPUs for decode. Models and chips are now designed for each other.
A plausible 2028 model
- Tokens in, with a 1M+ context
- Conditional memory lookup, prefetched from CPU memory
- A hybrid backbone repeated N times: three linear-attention blocks, one compressed sparse attention block, fine-grained MoE with 2 to 3% active
- Adaptive depth that loops or exits per request, plus test-time memory that learns during a session
- A parallel decoding head using diffusion drafts or multi-token prediction
- Served on disaggregated hardware and wrapped in an agent harness with tools, verifiers and escalation
That outer layer matters as much as the model, as our companion report on open-ended AI systems argues.
Evidence matrix
| Trend | In released models | Still unproven | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sparse MoE | Yes, widely | How far active share can fall | High |
| Compressed sparse attention | Yes | Quality at extreme compression | High |
| Hybrid linear attention | Yes | Best ratio and layer type | Medium to high |
| Conditional memory | Research model at 27B | Adoption beyond DeepSeek | Medium |
| Test-time learning | No | Isolated benefit, stability | Low to medium |
| Diffusion decoding | Small and mid-sized models | Frontier quality | Medium |
| Recursive reasoning | No general model | Transfer beyond puzzles | Low to medium |
Five predictions you can check in 2028
- Most newly released top-10 open models will use linear-time or state-space layers in more than half of their sequence-mixing layers.
- At least one flagship open MoE model will activate under 2% of its parameters per token.
- A non-autoregressive model will reach the top 10 of a major independent intelligence index.
- Every major cloud will offer inference that splits prefill and decode across chip types.
- At 1M tokens, the leading open model will need a tenth of DeepSeek V4's KV cache.
What this means for developers
- Long context will keep getting cheaper.
- Speed will split from intelligence, so pick models per task, as our guide to cost per solved task recommends.
- Do not hard-code one model. An OpenAI-compatible gateway lets you swap with one string.
- Re-test hybrid and diffusion models on your own tasks before switching.
Limits of this review
This is a literature and model-card review with no new experiments. Diffusion speeds and Mercury 3's claims are vendor figures. Details of V4's attention beyond the model card come from third-party analyses. Maturity ratings and predictions are judgements.
Frequently asked questions
What will AI model architecture look like in the future?
Sparse MoE with a few percent active, hybrid stacks of linear and compressed full attention, separate lookup memory and faster parallel decoding. Test-time learning and recursive reasoning are still research.
Is the Transformer being replaced?
Heavily modified rather than replaced. Hybrids keep about one full attention layer in four.
What is a hybrid linear attention model?
A model mixing fixed-memory linear or state-space layers with fewer standard attention layers, often at a 3:1 ratio.
Are diffusion language models better than normal LLMs?
Much faster, around 1,000 tokens per second, but they still trail the best autoregressive models on quality.
What is DeepSeek Engram?
A January 2026 conditional memory module of hashed N-gram lookup tables that can sit in CPU memory with under 3% overhead.
Why do MoE models get bigger but not slower?
Speed depends on active parameters. DeepSeek V4 Pro activates 49 billion of 1.6 trillion per token.
Sources
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro model card and technical report
- DeepSeek-V2 technical report
- DeepSeek-V3 technical report
- Mixtral of Experts
- Sebastian Raschka, hybrid attention gallery
- DeepSeek, Conditional Memory via Scalable Lookup
- Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Time
- Titans Revisited
- Mercury: Ultra-Fast Language Models Based on Diffusion
- Inception releases Mercury 3
- Google's DiffusionGemma
- Less is More: Recursive Reasoning with Tiny Networks