Try Chat Free Docs Pricing AI Analysis Repo Insights Free Tools About Blog
Sign in Get started free
< Back to blog
Research Velona Team ·24 October 2026 ·8 min read

The Shape of Future AI Models: Seven Architecture Trends from 2024 to 2026

Review copy. The full designed version, with diagrams, charts and FAQ schema, is in future-architecture.html and should be pasted in through the admin console before publishing.

The plain dense Transformer that powered ChatGPT in 2022 is being taken apart, one layer type at a time. By late 2026 the strongest open models activate about 3% of their parameters per token, replace three quarters of their attention layers with linear-time alternatives, compress their memory of the conversation by 90% or more, and in some cases stop generating text left to right at all. Each change responds to the same pressure: cost, and in particular the memory wall.

This report reviews seven architecture trends with evidence up to October 2026, rates their maturity, combines them into a plausible 2028 model and ends with five predictions that can be proved wrong.

Why the dense Transformer is under pressure

A classic Transformer uses every parameter for every token, and every attention layer compares each new token with every earlier one, so the key-value (KV) cache grows without limit. At 4,000 tokens this was fine. At 1 million tokens, with agents running for hours, it is not. Almost every trend below reads fewer bytes per token, keeps less state per user, or produces more tokens per pass.

TrendWhat it fixesExampleMaturity
1. Sparse mixture-of-expertsWeight bytes per tokenDeepSeek V4, Qwen3-CoderStandard
2. Compressed and sparse attentionKV cache sizeMLA, DeepSeek V4Standard
3. Hybrid linear attentionQuadratic attentionQwen3.5, Kimi Linear, Nemotron 3Entering flagships
4. Conditional memory lookupCompute wasted on recallDeepSeek EngramEmerging
5. Test-time memory and learningNo learning after trainingTitans, HopeResearch
6. Diffusion and parallel decodingOne token per memory passMercury 3, Gemini DiffusionEarly commercial
7. Recursive and latent reasoningPaying for reasoning in tokensTiny Recursive ModelResearch

1. Sparse mixture-of-experts becomes the default

MoE replaces each feed-forward block with many experts and a router that picks a few per token. The active share has fallen steeply:

ModelActive of totalActive share
Mixtral 8x7B (2024)13B of 47B27.7%
Qwen3-Coder-480B (2025)35B of 480B7.3%
DeepSeek V3 (2024)37B of 671B5.5%
DeepSeek V4 Flash (2026)13B of 284B4.6%
DeepSeek V4 Pro (2026)49B of 1.6T3.1%

Our benchmark of cheap LLMs for agents found DeepSeek V4 Flash tying Claude Opus 4.8 on 20-step agent chains at about one eleventh of the cost per run, largely because only 13 billion parameters work on each token.

2. Attention gets compressed and sparse

  1. Grouped-query attention: Llama 3 70B keeps 8 KV heads instead of 64, an 8× smaller cache.
  2. Multi-head Latent Attention: DeepSeek-V2 cut the KV cache 93.3% and lifted maximum throughput 5.76×.
  3. Compressed sparse attention: DeepSeek V4 (April 2026) combines Compressed Sparse Attention and Heavily Compressed Attention, needing 27% of V3.2's per-token compute and 10% of its KV cache at 1M tokens.

Third-party analyses describe V4's memory working at three timescales: recent tokens in plain attention, mid-range context as compressed blocks selected by a sparse index, and the distant past as heavily compressed summaries.

3. Hybrid linear attention enters the flagships

Linear attention and state-space models keep a fixed-size state instead of a growing cache. The 2025 to 2026 answer was to mix them with a little full attention. Qwen3-Next mixed three Gated DeltaNet blocks with one gated attention block and reached a native 262,000-token context, against 32,000 for its predecessor, and Qwen moved the hybrid into its flagship Qwen3.5. Kimi Linear refined the linear layer and used MLA for the full-attention layers. NVIDIA's Nemotron 3 interleaves Mamba-2 blocks with sparse MoE and keeps attention in only a few layers. The lesson: keep a little full attention for precise recall, and let cheap recurrent layers carry most of the sequence.

4. Conditional memory: stop recomputing what you could look up

In January 2026 DeepSeek published Conditional Memory via Scalable Lookup, introducing Engram, hashed N-gram embedding tables inside the network for constant-time retrieval of static patterns. Splitting a parameter budget between MoE experts and Engram tables produced a U-shaped scaling law, so the best results came from a mix. Scaled to 27 billion parameters, it beat an iso-parameter, iso-compute MoE baseline. Because lookups depend only on input tokens, they can be prefetched: DeepSeek offloaded a 100 billion parameter table to CPU memory with under 3% overhead. Early coverage linked Engram to V4, though V4's report emphasises its attention design and Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections.

5. Models that keep learning while they run

Titans (Behrouz and Zhong, NeurIPS 2025) pairs attention as short-term memory with a neural long-term memory whose weights update at test time based on surprise, and reports scaling past 2 million tokens. An independent reimplementation noted the specific benefit of the test-time updates was not isolated. Follow-up work on Nested Learning and Hope extends the idea, but none of it is in a major commercial model yet.

6. Diffusion: generating text in parallel

ModelReported tokens per secondSource
Gemini Diffusion1,479Google DeepMind demo average
Mercury Coder Mini1,109Artificial Analysis, H100
Mercury 31,068Inception claim, 19 October 2026, untested
DiffusionGemma~1,000Google, H100, open model
Mercury 2~720Artificial Analysis measured (claimed 1,009)
Typical frontier autoregressive model~100Industry estimate

Inception shipped Mercury 2 in February and Mercury 3 on 19 October with a 1M context and launch pricing of $0.10 per million input tokens. Ant Group scaled LLaDA 2.0 to 100 billion parameters. The DFlash framework uses a small diffusion model as a speculative drafter for over 6× speedups on some tasks. Quality still lags: Google notes DiffusionGemma trails Gemma 4.

7. Recursion and latent reasoning

Samsung SAIL's Tiny Recursive Model, with 7 million parameters, scored 45% on ARC-AGI-1 and 8% on ARC-AGI-2, above several large reasoning models, though it trains per task with 1,000× augmentation. Abstract Chain-of-Thought, covered in our 2026 research review, produced reasoning up to 12× shorter at matched accuracy.

The quieter changes underneath

DeepSeek V4 replaced residual connections with Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections, adopted the Muon optimizer and ran attention, normalisation and routing in FP8. NVIDIA's 2026 Rubin systems pair GPUs with SRAM-based Groq LPUs for decode. Models and chips are now designed for each other.

A plausible 2028 model

  1. Tokens in, with a 1M+ context
  2. Conditional memory lookup, prefetched from CPU memory
  3. A hybrid backbone repeated N times: three linear-attention blocks, one compressed sparse attention block, fine-grained MoE with 2 to 3% active
  4. Adaptive depth that loops or exits per request, plus test-time memory that learns during a session
  5. A parallel decoding head using diffusion drafts or multi-token prediction
  6. Served on disaggregated hardware and wrapped in an agent harness with tools, verifiers and escalation

That outer layer matters as much as the model, as our companion report on open-ended AI systems argues.

Evidence matrix

TrendIn released modelsStill unprovenConfidence
Sparse MoEYes, widelyHow far active share can fallHigh
Compressed sparse attentionYesQuality at extreme compressionHigh
Hybrid linear attentionYesBest ratio and layer typeMedium to high
Conditional memoryResearch model at 27BAdoption beyond DeepSeekMedium
Test-time learningNoIsolated benefit, stabilityLow to medium
Diffusion decodingSmall and mid-sized modelsFrontier qualityMedium
Recursive reasoningNo general modelTransfer beyond puzzlesLow to medium

Five predictions you can check in 2028

  1. Most newly released top-10 open models will use linear-time or state-space layers in more than half of their sequence-mixing layers.
  2. At least one flagship open MoE model will activate under 2% of its parameters per token.
  3. A non-autoregressive model will reach the top 10 of a major independent intelligence index.
  4. Every major cloud will offer inference that splits prefill and decode across chip types.
  5. At 1M tokens, the leading open model will need a tenth of DeepSeek V4's KV cache.

What this means for developers

Limits of this review

This is a literature and model-card review with no new experiments. Diffusion speeds and Mercury 3's claims are vendor figures. Details of V4's attention beyond the model card come from third-party analyses. Maturity ratings and predictions are judgements.

Frequently asked questions

What will AI model architecture look like in the future?

Sparse MoE with a few percent active, hybrid stacks of linear and compressed full attention, separate lookup memory and faster parallel decoding. Test-time learning and recursive reasoning are still research.

Is the Transformer being replaced?

Heavily modified rather than replaced. Hybrids keep about one full attention layer in four.

What is a hybrid linear attention model?

A model mixing fixed-memory linear or state-space layers with fewer standard attention layers, often at a 3:1 ratio.

Are diffusion language models better than normal LLMs?

Much faster, around 1,000 tokens per second, but they still trail the best autoregressive models on quality.

What is DeepSeek Engram?

A January 2026 conditional memory module of hashed N-gram lookup tables that can sit in CPU memory with under 3% overhead.

Why do MoE models get bigger but not slower?

Speed depends on active parameters. DeepSeek V4 Pro activates 49 billion of 1.6 trillion per token.

Sources